Regularized Loss With Hyperparameter Estimation for Weakly Supervised Single Class Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a new image level weakly supervised segmentation approach for datasets with a single object class of interest. Our approach is based on a regularized loss function inspired by the classical Conditional Random Field (CRF) modeling. Our loss models properties of generic objects, and we use it to guide CNN towards segments that are more likely to correspond to the object, thus avoiding the need for pixel precise annotations. Training CNN with regularized loss is a difficult task for gradient descent. We develop an annealing algorithm which is crucial for a successful training. Furthermore, we develop an approach for hyperparameter setting for the most important components of our regularized loss. This is far from trivial, since there is no pixel precise ground truth for guidance. The advantage of our method is that we use a standard CNN architecture and an easy to interpret loss function, derived from classical CRF models. Furthermore, we apply the same loss function for any task/dataset. We first evaluate our approach for salient object segmentation and co-segmentation. These tasks naturally involve one object class of interest. Then we adapt our approach to image level weakly supervised multi-class semantic segmentation. We obtain state-of-the-art results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".