Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique MontréalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDivision of Human Resource DevelopmentAustralian Research CouncilMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungScience and Technology Facilities CouncilAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónGovern de les Illes BalearsEuropean Regional Development FundCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueICTP South American Institute for Fundamental ResearchNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalNational Research FoundationVlaamse regeringFonds de Recherche en Santé RespiratoireMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanMinistry of Education, IndiaConseil Régional, Île-de-FranceCanada Foundation for InnovationFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSNarodowe Centrum NaukiScottish Universities Physics AllianceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Research Foundation of KoreaHungarian Scientific Research FundGeneralitat de CatalunyaGeneralitat ValencianaRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchConselleria de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital, Generalitat ValencianaFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaKavli FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research, IndiaCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaInstitut des Origines de LyonRussian Science FoundationEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustScottish Funding CouncilIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Sezione di PadovaFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejAbdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsRoyal SocietyScience and Engineering Research BoardNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLIGOPhysicsBinary numberBinary black holeAstrophysicsGravitational waveSkyConstant false alarm rateFalse alarmCalibrationAstronomyStatisticsAlgorithmComputer science
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexGWTC-2.1 is a catalog of gravitational wave events from compact binary coalescences from the first half of the third observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. It improves on GWTC-2, which covered the same period but with less refined analysis methods. GWTC-2.1 identifies 8 new events, all identified as sourced by binary black holes with one exception identified as a neutron star-black hole coalescence. These events expand significantly on the parameters characterizing the sources of observed gravitational-wave transients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.918
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
