MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390616616 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11803

Clustering spatial functional data using a geographically weighted Dirichlet process

2024· article· en· W4390616616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCluster analysisDirichlet processMarkov chain Monte CarloComputer scienceSpatial analysisSpatial dependenceBayesian probabilityNonparametric statisticsAutoregressive modelAlgorithmMathematicsData miningStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We propose a Bayesian nonparametric clustering approach to study the spatial heterogeneity effect for functional data observed at spatially correlated locations. We consider a geographically weighted Chinese restaurant process equipped with a conditional autoregressive prior to capture fully the spatial correlation of function curves. To sample efficiently from our model, we customize a prior called Quadratic Gamma, which ensures conjugacy. We design a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to infer simultaneously the posterior distributions of the number of groups and the grouping configurations. The superior numerical performance of the proposed method over competing methods is demonstrated using simulated examples and a U.S. annual precipitation study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it