MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deus como personagem em Jorge Luis Borges

2023· article· pt· W4390622283 on OpenAlexaff
Antônio Carlos de Melo Magalhães, Fernanda Medeiros de Figueirêdo

Bibliographic record

VenueTEOLITERARIA - Revista de Literaturas e Teologias · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBorges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deus, personagem apresentado pelo escritor argentino Jorge Luis Borges ao longo de sua obra, de acordo com esta pesquisa bibliográfica, é o verbo, a própria escrita que está em constante diálogo com outros deuses que, juntos, formam uma teia de correlações que podem ser harmônicas ou discordantes, com a potência de romper paradigmas e criar novos pactos linguísticos/literários. Como análise desse processo metalinguístico se delimita, inicialmente, o conto O Aleph (1949) para tratar da concepção da personagem enquanto ser que se expande a partir da proposta de infinitude da linguagem. Logo, a origem tão debatida no texto está na escrita ficcional e poética movida pela intertextualidade revisitada e presente em variados universos, especialmente o bíblico/cabalístico. Já a relação de repetição inserida nos contos e ensaios do autor evidencia um novo flanco de possibilidades à literatura equiparada ao ideário de biblioteca que povoa a ficção e a autobiografia do autor. A palavra criadora assume o controle da construção de Deus e todos os seus prolongamentos textuais que se replicam em discursos teológicos entre o natural e o sobrenatural da história lida e recontada incansavelmente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTEOLITERARIA - Revista de Literaturas e TeologiasSame topicBorges, Kipling, and Jewish IdentityFrench-language works237,207