V tieni súperenia dvoch revolúcií. Južné Slovensko počas obdobia prechodu (jeseň 1918 – leto 1919)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The processes of the disintegration of Hungarian statehood and establishment of Czechoslovakia overlapped in what is now southern Slovakia. On 29 December 1918, when Czechoslovak troops occupied Košice, the power of the Czechoslovak state was present in Slovakia, but the Hungarian/Magyar state was also still there: its institutions still existed, its laws were in force and, most importantly, its representatives lived there. It took almost a year, from autumn 1918 to autumn 1919, for Czechoslovakia to take over the role of historical Hungary and these months may rightly be regarded as a period of transition. The developments in southern Slovakia in that period were influenced by the dynamics of the events unfolding during the Czechoslovak Constitutional Revolution and the Hungarian Aster Revolution. These two revolutions mostly pursued conflicting goals and these contradictions became particularly evident in the February General Strike. The strike had two important objectives. On the one hand, the strikers wanted to express their commitment to Hungarian statehood and, on the other, they wanted to preserve the gains of the Aster Revolution. The paper concludes that the events of this transition period in Slovakia can only be meaningfully examined in the context of two interacting revolutions: the Czechoslovak Constitutional Revolution and the Hungarian Aster Revolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".