MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Être avec les rivières : regard inuit (Nunavik, Canada)

2023· article· fr· W4390641504 on OpenAlex
Laine Chanteloup, Fabienne Joliet, Thora Martina Herrmann

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-anthropologie · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Governance and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyEthnologyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les rivières du nord du Québec ont fait l’objet de toutes les attentions depuis les années 1960 et sont au centre des discussions engagées autour de l’exploitation hydro-électrique et, plus largement, du droit d’accès aux terres. De nombreux travaux s’intéressent aux différents points de vue sur les rivières, notamment pour les peuples autochtones dont les modes de vie sont intrinsèquement liés à cet environnement. Cet article explore les relations tissées par les Nunavimmiut (habitants du Nunavik, Québec) avec leurs rivières. Récits, images et parcours commentés mettent en perspective les expériences sensibles et multisensorielles entre corps inuit et corps des rivières. Ces relations apparaissent comme multiformes, passant par une coconstruction des histoires de chacun et des sens. Lorsqu’une rivière est affectée par un changement, que celui-ci soit anthropique ou plus naturel, cela vient directement transformer et reconstruire les sensibilités.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it