Être avec les rivières : regard inuit (Nunavik, Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les rivières du nord du Québec ont fait l’objet de toutes les attentions depuis les années 1960 et sont au centre des discussions engagées autour de l’exploitation hydro-électrique et, plus largement, du droit d’accès aux terres. De nombreux travaux s’intéressent aux différents points de vue sur les rivières, notamment pour les peuples autochtones dont les modes de vie sont intrinsèquement liés à cet environnement. Cet article explore les relations tissées par les Nunavimmiut (habitants du Nunavik, Québec) avec leurs rivières. Récits, images et parcours commentés mettent en perspective les expériences sensibles et multisensorielles entre corps inuit et corps des rivières. Ces relations apparaissent comme multiformes, passant par une coconstruction des histoires de chacun et des sens. Lorsqu’une rivière est affectée par un changement, que celui-ci soit anthropique ou plus naturel, cela vient directement transformer et reconstruire les sensibilités.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".