MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390641754 · doi:10.4000/communication.17703

Genre et réception

2023· article· fr· W4390641754 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dimitra Laurence Larochelle

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Feminism, and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicsHumanitiesArtPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les feuilletons télévisés turcs véhiculent une modernité alternative qui est caractérisée aussi bien par les normes dictées par le système patriarcal que par le conservatisme social imposé par le gouvernement actuellement au pouvoir en Turquie. En s’appuyant sur les données recueillies au cours d’une ethnographie des publics féminins grecs des feuilletons turcs, l’auteure souhaite illustrer les différentes formes de résistance des publics de la culture populaire face au système hégémonique sous le prisme du genre. Cette étude de cas a révélé que la résistance des récepteurs de sens aux rapports de pouvoir qui leur sont imposés n’est ni toujours oppositionnelle au texte médiatique ni forcément progressiste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0160.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1500.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication→Same topicGender, Feminism, and Media→French-language works237,207→