Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article fait état d’un projet collectif proposé aux étudiant·e·s du master Médias, langages et sociétés de l’Institut français de presse, au sein de l’Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas, autour des 50 ans du procès de Bobigny qui a eu un important retentissement médiatique et a participé à l’évolution de la législation sur l’avortement. En mettant à l’épreuve, dans un cadre pédagogique, des méthodes d’enquête sur le genre, il engage une réflexion sur la manière dont les pratiques pédagogiques peuvent être repensées en articulant l’enseignement, la recherche et la création. Il est l’occasion d’interroger les enjeux de la médiatisation de la recherche dans l’espace public ainsi que l’articulation des thématiques de recherche et des pratiques de transmission dans le cadre des enseignements en communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.214 | 0.139 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".