Corpo-comunidade e consenso: o estatuto da palavra em uma assembleia zapatista
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Partindo das relações descritas por Paoli entre palavra, consenso e comunidade no contexto das assembleias comunitárias tseltal, o interesse deste artigo é redescrever o quê cria a palavra zapatista e quais relações ela encaminha. Para isso, se detalhará uma perspectiva etnográfica a respeito da materialidade da palavra. Este exercício percorrerá a potência desta última em termos de dois relatos de criação: o Popol Vuh dos maias ki’che’ e La historia del aire de la noche, do Velho Antônio, dado a conhecer em um dos comunicados do Exército Zapatista de Liberação Nacional. A partir daí, esmiuçaremos o modo em que a noção de pessoa tsotsil se compatibiliza a uma filosofia política ameríndia, constituindo o impulso de fundo da autonomia zapatista. Corpo-comunidade é o conceito que usaremos para descrever o efeito do consenso e que guiará a etnografia das assembleias tsotsil e zapatistas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".