MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390641891 · doi:10.4000/aa.11441

Corpo-comunidade e consenso: o estatuto da palavra em uma assembleia zapatista

2023· article· pt· W4390641891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnuário Antropológico · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Cultures and History
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partindo das relações descritas por Paoli entre palavra, consenso e comunidade no contexto das assembleias comunitárias tseltal, o interesse deste artigo é redescrever o quê cria a palavra zapatista e quais relações ela encaminha. Para isso, se detalhará uma perspectiva etnográfica a respeito da materialidade da palavra. Este exercício percorrerá a potência desta última em termos de dois relatos de criação: o Popol Vuh dos maias ki’che’ e La historia del aire de la noche, do Velho Antônio, dado a conhecer em um dos comunicados do Exército Zapatista de Liberação Nacional. A partir daí, esmiuçaremos o modo em que a noção de pessoa tsotsil se compatibiliza a uma filosofia política ameríndia, constituindo o impulso de fundo da autonomia zapatista. Corpo-comunidade é o conceito que usaremos para descrever o efeito do consenso e que guiará a etnografia das assembleias tsotsil e zapatistas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it