MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390642160 · doi:10.4000/gef.1086

L’informatique au lycée : nouvel enseignement et anciens stéréotypes

2023· article· fr· W4390642160 on OpenAlex
M. Monfort, Manon Réguer-Petit

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenre Éducation Formation · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association for Co-operative Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article montre comment l’expérience de l’informatique au lycée peut conduire des lycéennes à déprécier leurs compétences dans ce domaine et à reformuler leur projet d’orientation en conséquent. Il s’appuie sur une enquête qualitative longitudinale menée dans cinq lycées franciliens, auprès d’élèves suivant l’option Informatique et Création Numérique et/ou l’enseignement Numérique et sciences informatiques, récemment introduit. L’article part du constat d’un abandon important et précoce de ces disciplines par les lycéennes, alors même qu’elles les avaient choisies. Il montre que l’expérience de ces enseignements, loin de favoriser un sentiment de montée en compétences, nourrit une autodépréciation de leur niveau par les filles. Ce processus d’autoévaluation négative s’explique par les modalités d’apprentissage valorisées dans ces enseignements : l’apprentissage par essai-erreur et le travail en sous-groupe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.274
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it