Use of solid thermolytic salts to facilitate microwave-induced in situ amorphization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moisture was frequently used as dielectric heating source in classical microwave-able systems to facilitate microwave-induced in situ amorphization, however such systems may face the potential of drug hydrolysis. In this study, solid thermolytic salts were proposed to function as moisture substitutes and their feasibility and impacts on microwave-induced in situ amorphization were investigated. It was found that NH4HCO3 was a promising solid alkaline salt to facilitate both microwave-induced in situ amorphization and in situ salt formation of acidic indomethacin (IND). Moreover, it could improve the chemical stability of the drug and the dissolution performance of compacts relative to classical moisture-based compacts upon microwaving. Further mechanistic study suggested that the in situ amorphization occurred prior to the in situ salt formation, especially in formulations with low drug loadings and high solid salt mass ratios. For compacts with low polymer ratios, in situ salt formation took place subsequently, where the previously amorphized IND within compacts could interact with the NH3 gas produced in situ by the decomposition of NH4HCO3 and form the ammonium IND salt. Microwaving time showed great impacts on the decomposition of NH4HCO3 and the in situ generation of water and NH3, which indirectly affected the amorphization and salt formation of IND. In comparison to the moisture-based systems, the NH4HCO3-based system showed a number of advantages, including the reduced potential of IND hydrolysis due to the absence of absorbed moisture, a wider category of applicable polymeric carriers other than hygroscopic polymers, and an increase in drug loading up to 50% (w/w).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".