The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Construction Management: A Case Study of Smart Worksite Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past few years, the progressive evolution of information technologies, including cloud computing, big data, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things, has become increasingly pervasive across diverse sectors of social development. This integration has spurred a widespread shift towards digitization, empowering various industries to embark on a journey toward high-quality development. Through meticulous analysis, this paper explores the profound impact of intelligent site systems on construction management, emphasizing the pivotal role played by artificial intelligence (AI) in augmenting efficiency, optimizing resources, and reinforcing safety protocols. Drawing insights from diverse case studies, the paper elaborates on how AI-driven smart site systems stimulate innovation and reform in the construction sector. By ushering in the era of digitization and intelligence, these systems propel the entire industry towards a technologically advanced future. In the context of this research, a profound understanding emerges of how intelligent construction management systems are instrumental in shaping the evolving landscape of the construction industry, steering it towards not only heightened efficiency but also a more sustainable and technologically integrated future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it