Relationship Between Supply Chain Management and Competitor Intensity in The Food Business: A Structural Equation Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supply Chain Management (S.C.M.) was developed as a system and coordination of strategies of business functions that manage supply chains to improve long-term performance. This study aims to analyze the relationship between the implementation of supply chain management and the intensity of competitors in the food business, analyze the relationship of competitor intensity to company performance, and provide recommendations on the Food and beverage business related to increasing competitiveness based on the implementation of supply chain management. The results showed that the implementation of supply chain management on competitor intensity has a significant relationship with an influence of 44.5%, and the relationship of competitor intensity to company performance is a meaningful relationship with a power of 65.2%. From the recommendations, food business people and innovative products are recommended to expand and cover the entire market by considering aspects of logistics distribution, digital marketing, and product gallery development
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it