Function of gluteus maximus and lower limbs injury in a global perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The gluteus maximus is the largest and strongest muscle in the body. As a stabilizing and dynamic muscle, he is involved in almost every movement related to the lower extremities. Its continuity with the other muscles in the fascia system and the mechanical closure provided in the sacroiliac joint ensure the stability of the lower limb joints during movement. As a mobilizer, gluteal contraction transmit force along the spiral line, lateral body line, and back functional line, helping the body generate or control movement. While the gluteus muscles have important functions, they are also prone to inhibition. This involves blockage innervation, reciprocal inhibition, synergistic dominance, as well as inflammation and pain. Gluteal muscle dysfunction is a cause and result of many lower limb injuries, such as ppfs, iliotibial band syndrome and sprain ankle. Restoring and maintaining normal gluteal muscle function is the basis of normal lower limb movement. Gluteal muscle function should be considered early in the rehabilitation process of lower limb injury. The main goal of this paper is to analyses the function of gluteus maximus in myofascial systems of low body and delve into the mechanisms behind the inhibition of gluteus maximus as well as resultant low body injuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".