MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390659936 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348419

The TNG50-SKIRT Atlas: Wavelength dependence of the effective radius

2024· article· en· W4390659936 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M. Baes, А. В. Мосенков, Raymond P. Kelly, Abdurrouf, Nick Andreadis, Sena Bokona Tulu, Peter Camps, Abdissa Tassama Emana, J. Fritz, Andrea Gebek, Antonio La Marca, Marco Martorano, Angelos Nersesian, Vicente Rodríguez-Gómez, C. Tortora, Ana Trc̆ka, Bert Vander Meulen, Arjen van der Wel, Lingyu Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsVlaamse regeringEuropean Research CouncilFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhysicsAtlas (anatomy)AstrophysicsRADIUSWavelengthAstronomyOpticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Galaxy sizes correlate with many other important properties of galaxies, and the cosmic evolution of galaxy sizes is an important observational diagnostic for constraining galaxy evolution models. The effective radius is probably the most widely used indicator of galaxy size. We used the TNG50-SKIRT Atlas to investigate the wavelength dependence of the effective radius of galaxies at optical and near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths. We find that, on average, the effective radius in every band exceeds the stellar mass effective radius, and that this excess systematically decreases with increasing wavelength. The optical g -band (NIR K s -band) effective radius is on average 58% (13%) larger than the stellar mass effective radius. Effective radii measured from dust-obscured images are systematically larger than those measured from dust-free images, although the effect is limited (8.7% in the g -band, 2.1% in the K s -band). We find that stellar population gradients are the dominant factor (about 80%) in driving the wavelength dependence of the effective radius, and that differential dust attenuation is a secondary factor (20%). Comparing our results to recent observational data, we find offsets in the absolute values of the median effective radii, up to 50% for the population of blue galaxies. We find better agreement in the slope of the wavelength dependence of the effective radius, with red galaxies having a slightly steeper slope than green–blue galaxies. Comparing our effective radii with those of galaxies from the Siena Galaxy Atlas in separate bins in z -band absolute magnitude and g − z colour, we find excellent agreement for the reddest galaxies, but again significant offsets for the blue populations: up to 70% for galaxies around M z = −21.5. This difference in median effective radius for the bluer galaxies is most probably due to intrinsic differences in the morphological structure of observed and TNG50 simulated galaxies. Finally, we find that the median effective radius in any broadband filter increases systematically with decreasing u − r colour and with increasing galaxy stellar mass, total SFR, sSFR, and dust-to-stellar-mass ratio. For the slope of the wavelength dependence of R e , however, there does not seem to be a systematic, monotonic correlation with any of these global properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207