MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390660787 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202308-1328oc

Host and Microbe Blood Metagenomics Reveals Key Pathways Characterizing Critical Illness Phenotypes

2024· article· en· W4390660787 on OpenAlexaff
Lucile Neyton, Pratik Sinha, Aartik Sarma, Eran Mick, Katrina Kalantar, Stephanie Chen, Nelson Wu, Kevin Delucchi, Hanjing Zhuo, Lieuwe D. J. Bos, Alejandra Jáuregui, Antonio Gómez, Carolyn M. Hendrickson, Kirsten N. Kangelaris, Aleksandra Leligdowicz, Kathleen D. Liu, Michael A. Matthay, Charles Langelier, Carolyn S. Calfee

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPhenotypeSepsisImmune dysregulationImmunologyMedicineGeneBiologyImmune systemGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Two molecular phenotypes of sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome, termed hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory, have been consistently identified by latent class analysis in numerous cohorts, with widely divergent clinical outcomes and differential responses to some treatments; however, the key biological differences between these phenotypes remain poorly understood. Objectives We used host and microbe metagenomic sequencing data from blood to deepen our understanding of biological differences between latent class analysis–derived phenotypes and to assess concordance between the latent class analysis–derived phenotypes and phenotypes reported by other investigative groups (e.g., Sepsis Response Signature [SRS1–2], molecular diagnosis and risk stratification of sepsis [MARS1–4], reactive and uninflamed). Methods We analyzed data from 113 patients with hypoinflammatory sepsis and 76 patients with hyperinflammatory sepsis enrolled in a two-hospital prospective cohort study. Molecular phenotypes had been previously assigned using latent class analysis. Measurements and Main Results The hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory phenotypes of sepsis had distinct gene expression signatures, with 5,755 genes (31%) differentially expressed. The hyperinflammatory phenotype was associated with elevated expression of innate immune response genes, whereas the hypoinflammatory phenotype was associated with elevated expression of adaptive immune response genes and, notably, T cell response genes. Plasma metagenomic analysis identified differences in prevalence of bacteremia, bacterial DNA abundance, and composition between the phenotypes, with an increased presence and abundance of Enterobacteriaceae in the hyperinflammatory phenotype. Significant overlap was observed between these phenotypes and previously identified transcriptional subtypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (reactive and uninflamed) and sepsis (SRS1–2). Analysis of data from the VANISH trial indicated that corticosteroids might have a detrimental effect in patients with the hypoinflammatory phenotype. Conclusions The hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory phenotypes have distinct transcriptional and metagenomic features that could be leveraged for precision treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207