MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

3D observations of room temperature capillary infiltration mechanism in SiC compacts

2024· article· en· W4390661766 on OpenAlexaff
Thibault Mouret, Kartikeya Upreti, Floriane Dewart, Alessandro Scola, Audrey Pons, A. Marchais, Nicolas Eberling‐Fux, Alexis Queva, S. Turenne

Bibliographic record

VenueCeramics International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceLiquid metalCapillary actionSilicon carbideInfiltration (HVAC)Composite materialCeramicPorositySiliconCeramic matrix compositeMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The melt infiltration of a liquid metal is a successful method for densifying metal and ceramic matrix composites (CMC). The reduction of residual porosity of silicon carbide composites by infiltration of molten silicon into the matrix allows to reach interesting mechanical properties. However, fluid progression within the pore network of the granular matrix is a complex phenomenon, driven by physical and thermomechanical mechanisms that are not yet fully understood. This publication focuses on the capillary impregnation at room temperature and highlights important parameters related to the physical aspect of the process. Two different model fluids ( n -hexadecane and exo -dicyclopentadiene) were used to reproduce the behaviour of molten silicon alloy . During the infiltration, the monitoring of the infiltrated liquid weight, along with the image acquisition, was used to compare the infiltration difference between several types of samples. An innovative way to interrupt and fix liquid inside samples, based on rapid polymerization , was investigated during capillary rise experiments. The correlation between 2D observations and 3D volumes obtained by tomography outlines the existence of two different flow fronts, the surface flow front (SFF) which often have a flat shape, and a second inside the sample, the volume flow front (VFF), which shows a paraboloid shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCeramics InternationalSame topicAdvanced ceramic materials synthesisFrench-language works237,207