MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390678857 · doi:10.36887/2415-8453-2023-4-39

Features of internet marketing activities of companies of the agricultural sector

2023· article· en· W4390678857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUkrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessMarketingThe InternetDigital marketingAgrarian societyAgricultural marketingAgricultureMarketing managementRelationship marketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we have explored essential aspects of Internet marketing activities for enterprises in the agrarian sector. The implementation and development of Internet marketing in agrarian enterprises are among today's most relevant and crucial issues. Regardless of the field of activity, competitive position, and size, agricultural enterprises gain opportunities for accessing the global market, utilizing new tools and mean for promoting products and services in various markets and finding diverse ways to interact with the target audience, better satisfying its needs. Regarding Internet marketing utilization, the domestic agricultural sector must catch up to the American, Canadian, and European markets. Today, agricultural enterprises can be divided into two groups: (1) companies that have already begun to change under the influence of Internet technologies, using specific Internet marketing tools and technologies; (2) enterprises that need to start changing. The widespread penetration of the Internet into all aspects of life has changed the rules of human life and business conduct, including agriculture. Internet marketing in the agrarian sector is a source of profitability, a tool for promoting agricultural products and services in markets, and a technology for conducting agribusiness. We analyzed the Internet marketing activities of leading agro-holdings in the domestic market, namely Mironivsky Hliboproduct, Kernel, Nibulon, Agroprosperis, and Astarta Holding. We identified effective channels for attracting clients to websites and Internet technologies used by companies for functioning in the online environment. These channels and tools include Direct Referral, search engine optimization (SEO), and social media marketing (SMM). We established that company websites should be mobile-friendly since 19-70% of consumers browse websites from smartphones. In the article, we revealed important features of Internet marketing activities that agricultural enterprises need to consider to develop and successfully use its tools and technologies. We also identified the advantages and opportunities that agricultural enterprises gain from implementing Internet marketing. Critical advantages of Internet marketing for agricultural sector enterprises include precise targeting, analysis of activity results, personalized communication, and many others. Keywords: Internet marketing, Internet marketing activity, enterprise, agricultural holdings, agricultural sector, Internet technologies, features of Internet marketing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it