MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390692383 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3352051

Delay-and-Sum Beamforming-Based Spatial Mapping for Multisource Sound Localization

2024· article· en· W4390692383 on OpenAlexaff
Changjiang He, Siyao Cheng, Rong Zheng, Jie Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaKey Research and Development Program of Heilongjiang
KeywordsComputer scienceRedundancy (engineering)Feature extractionAcoustic source localizationDirection of arrivalAzimuthBeamformingPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionAcousticsSound (geography)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-source sound localization can find applications in many domains including auditory scene analysis, fault detection and diagnosis in manufacturing, augmented reality, etc. In far fields, 3D sound source localization is equivalent to finding the direction of arrival (DOA), namely, the azimuth and elevation angles of sound sources. Recent DOA estimation pipelines take multichannel audio inputs, extract spectral features from each channel and then feed them into a deep neural network. Unfortunately, the spectral features contain only the time-frequency information of the audio signals, while spatial information is only implicitly captured in the signals across different channels, which is highly dependent on the acoustic array geometry. To embed the spatial information of the sound source into the spectral feature representation, we propose a DSB-based spatial mapping method encode sound source location information. It can be combined with different feature extraction methods and machine learning models for DOA estimation. Furthermore, a redundancy removal procedure is proposed to accelerate DSB computation so that the pipeline can run in real-time on embedded GPUs, such as NVidia Jeston Nano. We conduct extensive experiments using two neural network models along with the DSB method on two datasets. The experiments demonstrate that the DOA errors can be effectively reduced using the DSB method. When combining DSB for feature extraction, the DOA errors are reduced by up to 19.24%. In addition, the feature extraction process is accelerated by up to 30.42% after the application of redundancy removal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207