Valoración Pedagógica del Alumnado sobre la Implementaciónde la Metodología Team Teaching en las Aulas Universitarias
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: This research is based on a Teaching Innovation Project framed within the Team-Teaching model, which refers to a methodology in which two teachers teach together.Its implementation is relevant, as it can favor an improvement in the teaching-learning process by increasing student satisfaction, participation, and motivation.Method: The project was carried out during the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 academic years, involving a total of 69 students of the Degree in Pedagogy at a university in the north of Spain, to determine the students' pedagogical assessment of the Team-Teaching methodology.Results: The results show high student satisfaction with this methodology and high scores in the assessment of classroom management, personalized attention, and knowledge construction. Conclusion:The findings show a high compliance with the proposed objectives, suggesting that the Team-Teaching methodology is suitable for motivating university students and encouraging more active and committed participation in the classroom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it