MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390706379 · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyae005

Evenamide: A Potential Pharmacotherapeutic Alternative for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

2024· article· en· W4390706379 on OpenAlexafffund
Raghunath Singh, Margaret Hahn, Yashika Bansal, Sri Mahavir Agarwal, Gary Remington

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsDiabetes CanadaUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersBanting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHLS TherapeuticsUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)MedicinePsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a complex psychiatric syndrome affecting over 1% of the world population and a leading cause of global disability (Marder and Cannon, 2019). Antipsychotics (APs) are the cornerstone of treatment in SCZ and generally effective in treating symptoms of psychosis. However, a significant proportion (nearly one-fifth to one-half) of individuals with SCZ remain unresponsive to AP treatment. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is defined as a persistent occurrence of positive symptoms following 2 trials of adequate (dose and duration) AP treatment (Howes et al., 2017; Potkin et al., 2020). Onset of TRS may occur during the first episode of psychosis or may develop later in the illness (Potkin et al., 2020). TRS patients have an increased risk of mortality and morbidity and usually require frequent hospitalization, adding to societal economic burden and cost (Kadakia et al., 2022; Anand et al., 2023). Clozapine remains the only agent approved to treat TRS, although it remains markedly underutilized secondary to its side effects profile, in particular agranulocytosis and the associated requirement of routine bloodwork in most countries (Marder and Cannon, 2019). Alongside other SGAs, clozapine is also associated with inducing severe metabolic side effects, such as weight gain and type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular complications (QTc prolongation), gastroparesis, and risk of seizure (Yuen et al., 2018). Furthermore, nearly 60% of the TRS patients demonstrate a suboptimal response to clozapine (Siskind et al., 2017). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been beneficial as an augmentation strategy in clozapine-resistant SCZ, while evidence related to the addition of other antipsychotic agents remains equivocal (Potkin et al., 2020). Lack of options to currently manage TRS and clozapine’s limited efficacy have encouraged ongoing work addressing treatment options. One such line of investigation has focused on glutamatergic or N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction in SCZ. Nonresponders with first episode of psychosis, as well as individuals with TRS, have been shown to demonstrate normal dopamine synthesis (Kim et al., 2017) but higher glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (Jauhar et al., 2018), encouraging the pursuit of agents targeting NMDAR. Evenamide, formerly NW-3509 and developed by Newron Pharmaceuticals, is a chemical moiety that inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels and normalizes the excessive synaptic glutamate (without affecting basal levels) produced as a result of NMDAR hypofunction. In doing so, evenamide reduces cortical and hippocampal hyperexcitability without affecting other neurotransmitter systems, which may be implicated in various adverse side effects (Anand et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2019). Its efficacy has been examined in several preclinical models, such as ketamine-induced disrupted pre-pulse inhibition (Bortolato et al., 2018), as well as phencyclidine-induced social deficits (Faravelli et al., 2016). Evenamide alone or in combination with clozapine significantly restored ketamine-induced pre-pulse inhibition deficits in rats (Bortolato et al., 2018). Clinical studies have also supported both efficacy and safety of evenamide (Singh et al., 2019). For example, in a preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial involving 89 patients with mild to moderately severe SCZ, 4 weeks of evenamide (15–25 mg b.i.d.) in combination with risperidone or aripiprazole significantly improved Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and positive subscale scores, as well as Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale scores. It was well tolerated, although adverse events in 2 patients included atrial fibrillation and seizure, respectively, which require further investigation (Anand et al., 2018). Based on these pilot data (Anand et al., 2018), this recently published phase-II clinical trial evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of evenamide as an add-on to existing AP (except clozapine) treatment in patients meeting criteria for TRS (Anand et al., 2023). Treatment response and resistance in psychosis guidelines were used for the diagnosis of TRS (Howes et al., 2017). At baseline, patients had moderate to severe illness (CGI-S between 4 and 6), predominant positive symptoms (score of ≥4), and functional deficits. In 161 patients, the mean duration of illness was 6.8 years, while olanzapine and risperidone were the most commonly prescribed APs (81.3%), with the mean daily dose of 21.7 mg and 7.5 mg, respectively. In all patients (n = 156) at 6 weeks, the PANSS total score was significantly reduced (11.6% from baseline to sixth week). In patients who completed 1 year of the study (n = 97), improvement in the PANSS total score remained significant at 6 months (15.9%) and 1 year (18.6%). Similarly, the proportion of PANSS “responders” (≥20% improvement in total PANSS score) also increased from 16.5% (at week 6) to 39.2% (at month 6) to 47.4% (at 1 year). In “responders,” clinically significant efficacy of evenamide was also observed in terms of CGI severity of illness (CGI-S 16.5% at 6 months, 28.9% at 1 year) and CGI change from the baseline (CGI-C 36.1% at 6 months, 41.2% at 1 year). Again, over the 1-year treatment duration, evenamide was well tolerated. Two patients discontinued due to adverse events (influenza-like symptoms and somnolence). Other treatment-emergent adverse events included dizziness, insomnia, and pyrexia (in 4 patients) (Anand et al., 2023). Despite these early promising findings, the current study has several limitations: (1) it is not a placebo-controlled or double-blind study, and the majority of the patients enrolled were from 1 country (India), which limits the finding’s generalizability; (2) positive symptoms are often defined as the core features of TRS, although the current study did not report on this domain specifically, instead presenting data on total PANSS score changes only; and (3) other findings cited (Anand et al., 2017, 2018) represent conference abstracts, which are not peer reviewed or do not provide access to the full data set. In addition, the results from the open label study showing overall improvement in symptoms and safety of evenamide are superficially impressive but comparable to Lu AF35700, which failed to separate from an active comparator (risperidone/olanzapine) (Kane et al., 2022). This further highlights the importance of evidence established through a double-blind design. Taken together, the long-term efficacy and safety of evenamide warrant a global (multicentric), double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Replication of the current results, including comparison with the sole approved treatment for TRS (clozapine), would favorably position this line of investigation as a novel approach in the psychopharmacotherapy of TRS. D. H. Gales Family Charitable Foundation, Banting and Best Diabetes Centre (BBDC), University of Toronto; Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); and CAMH discovery funds are gratefully acknowledged for providing postdoctoral fellowships to R.S. M.K.H. is supported by the CAMH and University of Toronto Meighen Family Research Chair. G.R. has received research support from CIHR and University of Toronto. G.R. has received a consultant fee from HLS Therapeutics Inc. M.K.H. has received Alkermes consultant fees. S.M.A. has served as consultant for HLS Therapeutics and on the Ad-board for Boehringer Ingelheim, Canada. No new data was generated or analyzed to support this research. Conceptualization (RS, and YB); Writing the original draft (RS); Writing- review & editing (MKH, SMA, and GR); Supervision (GR, and MKH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207