Nouvelles et formes narratives brèves dans les littératures francophones contemporaines: regards comparés au féminin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo propone una mirada comparativa entre tres relatos cortos y un texto breve en prosa poética pertenecientes a cuatro escritoras francófonas de origen argelino, canadiense y libanés: Assia Djebar, Hélène Brodeur, Marguerite Andersen y Georgia Makhlouf. El estudio crítico analiza los rasgos discursivos, formales y temáticos de cada uno de los textos seleccionados siguiendo un orden cronológico comprendido entre 1966 y 2007, fechas de la primera y última publicaciones. Se repara por último en las similitudes y diferencias entre las cuatro obras del corpus y en la recepción crítica de estas formas narrativas breves en el conjunto de la producción literaria de estas autoras. Cet article propose un regard comparé sur trois nouvelles et un récit bref en prose poétique appartenants à quatre écrivaines francophones d'origine algérienne, canadienne et libanaise: Assia Djebar, Hélène Brodeur, Marguerite Andersen et Georgia Makhlouf. L'étude critique analysera les traits discursifs, formels et thématiques dans chacun des textes choisis, suivant un ordre chronologique de publication compris entre 1966 et 2007. Les similitudes et divergences entre les quatre ouvrages du corpus seront également mises en lumière, au même temps qu'on s'arrêtera à la portée critique de ces textes dans le parcours créatif de ces auteures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".