MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390712968 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v18i1.73590

Intriguing sets of strongly regular graphs and their related structures

2023· article· en· W4390712968 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dean Crnković, Francesco Pavese, Andrea Švob

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsIndifference graphChordal graphStrongly regular graphRank (graph theory)Discrete mathematicsPathwidthGraphLine graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we outline a technique for constructing directed strongly regular graphs by using strongly regular graphs having a "nice" family of intriguing sets. Further, we investigate such a construction method for rank three strongly regular graphs having at most $45$ vertices. Finally, several examples of intriguing sets of polar spaces are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicRings, Modules, and AlgebrasFrench-language works237,207