MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390713454 · doi:10.23977/jeeem.2023.060516

Research on optimized heliostat field based on dense circular arrangement

2023· article· en· W4390713454 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sizhe Xie, Yao Li, Mingjie Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electrotechnology Electrical Engineering and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeliostatPhotovoltaic systemOpticsSolar energyTowerField (mathematics)ThermalParabolic reflectorRadiationComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringMeteorologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar energy is generally utilized in two ways. One is to utilize the photovoltaic effect to convert light energy into electrical energy; the other is to utilize sunlight radiation to convert light energy into heat energy. The second way is realized by the tower solar thermal power generation system in industry, and the main factor affecting the tower solar thermal power generation system is the fixed heliographic mirror field. In this paper, by establishing a physical model of the heliostat mirror field, a simulated annealing optimization algorithm is used to theoretically optimize the design of the existing heliostat mirror field, and ultimately an approximate dense circular arrangement of the mirror field is found, which results in the highest average annual power output per unit of mirror surface area. The final optimized fixed-sun mirror field arrangement in this paper will effectively improve the optical efficiency of the mirror field and contribute to the development of the photovoltaic industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electrotechnology Electrical Engineering and ManagementSame topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207