MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390717496 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adl1803

Quantum control of flying doughnut terahertz pulses

2024· article· en· W4390717496 on OpenAlexafffund
Kamalesh Jana, Yonghao Mi, Søren H. Møller, Dong Hyuk Ko, Shima Gholam-Mirzaei, Daryoush Abdollahpour, Shawn Sederberg, P. B. Corkum

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityJoint Attosecond Science Laboratory
FundersArmy Research OfficeU.S. ArmyAdvanced Research Projects AgencyDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTerahertz radiationPhysicsMagnetic fieldOpticsElectric fieldPulse (music)OptoelectronicsTerahertz spectroscopy and technologySpectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207