The J-Like Protein ARC6 Regulates Chloroplast FtsZ-Ring Assembly through Fine-tuning ARC3 Activity in Arabidopsis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chloroplast division is initiated by the establishment of the stromal FtsZ ring (Z ring). Assembly and positioning of the Z ring are governed by the chloroplast Min system, which inhibits Z-ring formation everywhere but the middle of the chloroplast. ACCUMULATION AND REPLICATION OF CHLOROPLASTS3 (ARC3), the core component of this system, is a direct inhibitor of Z-ring assembly. Regulation of ARC3 activity is vital thus for chloroplast division. Here, we report that ARC6, which localizes on the chloroplast inner envelope membrane, interacts with ARC3 and acts upstream of ARC3 during chloroplast division. We show that the C-terminal MORN domain of ARC3, demonstrated previously to prevent ARC3-FtsZ interaction, binds to the J-like domain (JLD) of ARC6, enabling full-length ARC3 to interact with FtsZ proteins and activating the inhibitory activity of ARC3 on the assembly of FtsZ filaments. Overexpression of a JLD-deleted version of ARC6 causes disruption of Z-ring formation in an ARC3-dependent manner. Finally, we reveal that ARC6 recruits ARC3 to the middle of the chloroplast. Our findings suggest a model whereby ARC6 regulates the assembly and positioning of the Z ring through fine-tuning the inhibitory activity of ARC3 at the chloroplast division site. One Sentence Summary The chloroplast membrane protein ARC6 recruits ARC3 to the chloroplast division site and regulates the assembly of the FtsZ ring by fine-tuning ARC3 activity through its J-like domain. The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors ( https://academic.oup.com/plcell/pages/General-Instructions ) is: Cheng Chen ( cgchen@sjtu.edu.cn ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".