MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390727029 · doi:10.1017/9781800108875.003

Literary Adventures in Télémacomania

2023· other· fr· W4390727029 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSublimeTragedy (event)AdventureArtLiteratureLiterary genreArt historyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J’avouë que le genre [tragique] a ses graces; mais … le genre fleuri n’atteint jamais au sublime. [I confess that the genre of tragedy has its charms; but … a flowery genre never arrives at the sublime.] —François Fénelon, Lettre écrite à l’Académie française The literary “adventure” of this exhibit begins with a bestselling epic book that turned into a cultural fiasco of epic proportions. In 1699 the archbishop and royal tutor François Fénelon found himself dragged into a fraught controversy over his novel, Les Aventures de Télémaque . On the face of it, the book was an unlikely catalyst for scandal. Fénelon himself did not even authorize the novel's publication and certainly did not anticipate the vitriolic paper wars that persisted for several decades following its distribution. Much to his horror, Télémaque quickly became the most notorious novel of the Enlightenment: the book's Homeric setting, far from acting as a neutral generic framework, instead intensified readers’ perception of Fénelon's literary modernity. Accused of political and poetic radicalism, Fénelon found himself embroiled in a dangerous dispute over the limits of literature. To his more conservative readers, the novel made the classical world come alive for the wrong reasons: its exciting plot lines distracted from its instructional mandate and its historical- mythological characters shed a negative light on France's reigning monarch. To more forward-looking readers, Fénelon offered an experience of the ancient world that was thoroughly contemporary: he described Télémaque 's antiquarian world in vivid but plain language, inviting his modern-day readers to immerse themselves in its sensory landscape unconstrained by notions of deference to ancient genres and powerful patrons. By midcentury, Télémaque had evolved into a spectacle that spilled over into all cultural venues; the Encyclopédie 's countless references bear witness to its inescapable influence. In this exhibit, we scrutinize two intersecting stages of reform through the example of Télémaque . Initially, the novel prompted a French literary movement distancing itself from absolutism by renouncing traditional poetic forms: the neoclassical verse of theater was an obvious target for “modernization,” and advocates for literary reform set about rewriting Louis XIV's most cherished plays in prose. This campaign subsequently became an inescapable backdrop against which librettists and composers sought to reform dramma per musica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFrench Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207