Bibliographic record
Abstract
Guillaume Budé (b. 1467–d. 1540) is one of the most relevant French contemporaries of Erasmus, and a friend of his. As a scholar, Budé improved several fields of research, such as studies on Roman law and Ancient Greek lexicography. A high civil servant and not a professor, Guillaume Budé is also credited with the creation of the first chairs (1530) of Collège de France. Budé received a traditional education in law before starting humanistic studies around 1491 and entering the circle of intellectuals gathered by Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples. He then learned Ancient Greek and became one of the first modern Frenchmen to master this language to a level comparable to that of contemporary Italians. Not only did he start as a humanist by publishing some short translations from Greek into Latin (1505–1506), but he culminated his career with the Commentaries on the Greek Tongue in 1529, his most celebrated work (Commentarii Graecae linguae; posthumous, revised edition,1548). Between these two achievements, Budé ensured considerable results with other massive scholarly works. He first studied in a new way—which will later be called the Mos Gallicus Jura docendi—the texts of Corpus Juris, combining Greek and Latin philology, encyclopedic and legal knowledge, theoretical skills in his 1508 Annotations on the Digest (Annotationes in XXIV Pandectarum libros, followed by Annotationes reliquae in Pandectas in 1526). He then uncovered a vast portion of Antiquity, and resolved some textual enigmas, with The Roman As and Its Fractions (De Asse and Partibus eius Libri V, 1515, followed by six revised editions), a five-book tentacular monograph often simply called De Asse. It focuses on the vocabulary of quantities, their literary expressions, in words and abbreviations, and the resulting textual corruption or misunderstanding, thus allowing a more precise interpretation of Greek and Latin classics in general. Besides his international correspondence, Budé’s production includes moral essays and exhortations to humanistic studies. It ends in 1535 with From Hellenism to Christianism (De Transitu Hellenismi ad Christianismum), a meditation on the importance of religious devotion for a learned man, and a political answer to the Affaire des Placards, an anti-Catholic scandal that occurred in 1534 and endangered the Parisian and French humanist current. While 19th- and early 20th-century scholarship has rediscovered Budé’s original contribution to European humanism, recent research has focused on his literary production and his philological achievements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.147 | 0.144 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".