MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390733856 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348592

The compact multi-planet system GJ 9827 revisited with ESPRESSO

2024· article· en· W4390733856 on OpenAlexfundno aff
V. M. Passegger, A. Suárez Mascareño, Romain Allart, J. I. Gónzalez Hernández, C. Lovis, B. Lavie, A. M. Silva, H. M. Müller, H. M. Tabernero, S. Cristiani, F. Pepe, R. Rébolo, N. C. Santos, V. Adibekyan, Y. Alibert, Carlos Allende Prieto, S. C. C. Barros, F. Bouchy, A. Castro-González, V. D’Odorico, X. Dumusque, P. Di Marcantonio, D. Ehrenreich, P. Figueira, R. Génova Santos, G. Lo Curto, C. J. A. P. Martins, A. Mehner, G. Micela, P. Molaro, N. Nari, N. J. Nunes, Ε. Πάλλη, E. Poretti, J. Rodrigues, S. G. Sousa, A. Sozzetti, S. Udry, M. R. Zapatero Osorio

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónEuropean Regional Development FundFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNational Science FoundationEuropean Research CouncilMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsPhysicsPlanetRadial velocityAstrophysicsPlanetary systemSuper-EarthExoplanetNeptuneAmplitudeAstronomyStar (game theory)Envelope (radar)StarsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GJ 9827 is a bright, nearby K7V star orbited by two super-Earths and one mini-Neptune on close-in orbits. The system was first discovered using K2 data and then further characterized by other spectroscopic and photometric instruments. Previous literature studies provide several mass measurements for the three planets, however, with large variations and uncertainties. To better constrain the planetary masses, we added high-precision radial velocity measurements from ESPRESSO to published datasets from HARPS, HARPS-N, and HIRES and we performed a Gaussian process analysis combining radial velocity and photometric datasets from K2 and TESS. This method allowed us to model the stellar activity signal and derive precise planetary parameters. We determined planetary masses of Mb = 4.28−0.33+0.35 M⊕, Mc = 1.86−0.39+0.37 M⊕, and Md = 3.02−0.57+0.58 M⊕, and orbital periods of 1.208974 ± 0.000001 days for planet b, 3.648103−0.000010+0.000013 days for planet c, and 6.201812 ± 0.000009 days for planet d. We compared our results to literature values and found that our derived uncertainties for the planetary mass, period, and radial velocity amplitude are smaller than the previously determined uncertainties. We modeled the interior composition of the three planets using the machine-learning-based tool ExoMDN and conclude that GJ 9827 b and c have an Earth-like composition, whereas GJ 9827 d has an hydrogen envelope, which, together with its density, places it in the mini-Neptune regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→