Efficient off‐policy Q‐learning for multi‐agent systems by solving dual games
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article develops distributed optimal control policies via Q‐learning for multi‐agent systems (MASs) by solving dual games. According to game theory, first, the distributed consensus problem is formulated as a multi‐player non‐zero‐sum game, where each agent is viewed as a player focusing only on its local performance and the whole MAS achieves Nash equilibrium. Second, for each agent, the anti‐disturbance problem is formulated as a two‐player zero‐sum game, in which the control input and external disturbance are a pair of opponents. Specifically, (1) an offline data‐driven off‐policy for distributed tracking algorithm based on momentum policy gradient (MPG) is developed, which can effectively achieve consensus of MASs with guaranteed ‐bounded synchronization error. (2) An actor‐critic‐disturbance neural network is employed to implement the MPG algorithm and obtain optimal policies. Finally, numerical and practical simulation results are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the developed tracking policies via MPG algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it