MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390738662 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3352597

Orthogonal Tensor Recovery Based on Non-Convex Regularization and Rank Estimation

2024· article· en· W4390738662 on OpenAlexaff
X. T. Chen, Jingjing Zheng, Li Zhao, Wei Jiang, Xiaoqin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTensor (intrinsic definition)MathematicsRank (graph theory)Cartesian tensorTensor densityApplied mathematicsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisTensor fieldPure mathematicsCombinatoricsExact solutions in general relativity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a method for orthogonal tensor recovery based on non-convex regularization and rank estimation (OTRN-RE) is proposed, which aims to accurately recover the low-rank and sparse components of the tensor. Specifically, a new low-rank tensor decomposition algorithm is designed, which can efficiently establish the equivalence between the rank of a large tensor before decomposition and the rank of the coefficient tensor after decomposition. The large tensor is decomposed into a small standard orthogonal tensor and another coefficient tensor, and a generalized non-convex regularization is used to inscribe the low rank of the coefficient tensor. Meanwhile, a new rank estimation strategy is developed to dynamically adjust the size of small orthogonal tensors and coefficient tensors. Experimental results on image denoising and salient object detection tasks confirm the state-of-the-art performance of the proposed method in terms of denoising capability and computational speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicTensor decomposition and applicationsFrench-language works237,207