MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390739190 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3835232/v1

Large-scale three-dimensional experimental investigation on potential high position landslide‑induced waves in Gushui Reservoir, China

2024· preprint· en· W4390739190 on OpenAlexaff
Shizhuang Chen, Weiya Xu, Yelin Feng, Yan Long, Yangyang Zhang, Fengyuan Cao, Huanling Wang, Wei‐Chau Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLandslideGeologyScale (ratio)AttenuationGeotechnical engineeringSeismologyHydrology (agriculture)CartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The occurrence of landslides in reservoir areas and the potential secondary disasters near dams are characterized by their sudden and catastrophic nature, often limiting the availability of actual measurement data. To address this challenge, prototype physical model test always proves to be valuable method to replicate or reproduce such geological hazards. In this study, we focused on the Meilishi landslide in the Gushui reservoir area as a case study to analyze the potential threat of high position landslide-induced waves under gravity. Based on field investigations and relevant statistical geological data, a large-scale three-dimensional physical model was carried out that integrated the interactions of the landslide, the river, and the dam. With a scale of 1:150, the model had the dimensions of 57, 27, and 8 m. Water level and the maximum sliding velocity into the water were selected as independent variables, leading to a total of 18 experiments. An adaptive landslide motion simulation system based on velocity equivalence and a comprehensive measurement system with tracking technology based on hydrodynamics were independently developed. Those approaches allowed us to reveal the propagation characteristics and attenuation laws of high position landslide-induced waves in a curved channel under various complex conditions. The data showed that the maximum wave run-up height on dam was 17.97 m under the most dangerous working condition (H3C09). Importantly, this value did not exceed the maximum height of dam, indicating a certain level of safety margin for the dam. Combined with the data of different working conditions, the optimal window for landslide risk prevention and control warnings was within 550 s after the onset of landslide instability. The key parameters predicted by the tests, including head wave height, wave run-up height on the opposite bank, wave run-up height on dam, and the propagation times, provided a technical basis and valuable reference for dam engineering design and safety. These results make significant contributions to the prevention and control of similar surges hazard induced by high position landslides around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicLandslides and related hazards→French-language works237,207→