MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390742077 · doi:10.1017/9781800108875.005

Imagi(ni)ng the Prose Epic

2023· other· en· W4390742077 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectacleEPICArtPaintingArt historyHumanitiesPhilosophyLiteraturePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Spectacle est un mensonge; il s’agit de le rapprocher de la plus grande vérité: le Spectacle est un tableau. [The theater is a lie; it is a matter of bringing it as close as possible to the greatest truth: the Theater is a painting.] —Louis-Sébastien Mercier, Du Théâtre Our museum so far has exhibited tragic opera alongside its closest literary collaborators. With good reason: Télémacomania was first and foremost a controversy stirred by words and fueled by pamphlets and letters. The novel's galvanizing energy, however, was by no means limited to the Enlightenment's frenzied debates about literary poetics and tragic reform. Quite the contrary: Télémaque immediately penetrated the visual arts and became popular on the operatic stage for several reasons. In the first place, Fénelon's prose famously conjured up spectacular Mediterranean topographies as the backdrop for sensual encounters between the novel's protagonist and his many temptresses. These images begged to be animated in a visual medium, and painters and dramaturgs could not resist the invitation to render these scenes in the two- and three-dimensional spaces of the canvas and the stage. Secondly, the novel's epic features offered composers and librettists a source text ideally suited to the epic-tragic reform genre synthesizing French tragédie lyrique and Italian dramma per musica, mythological and historical narratives, the spectacle of le merveilleux and neoclassical Aristotelian design. In our first exhibit, we became involved in the scandal that began with Télémaque but almost immediately spun off into broader debates surrounding prose poetry. In this second exhibit, we first return to Télémaque in order to explore Fénelon's unsettled relationship with the pictorial qualities of his epic genre, specifically the value of animating non-Christian narratives in vivid detail. We will then view a collection of Télémaque -inspired canvases before turning our attention to Idomeneo , a piece whose powerful visual scenography captures and intensifies Fénelon's political turbulence through opera's full arsenal of effects. As we will discover, Idomeneo 's reformist features build on a century of literary debate and operatic experimentation but also absorb a thriving visual culture inspired by Fénelon's modern prose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207