MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Frozen Semen Quality of Kalang Buffalo Using Lycopene

2024· article· en· W4390742387 on OpenAlexaff
Rizkie Elvania, Tintin Rostini, Sakiman Sakiman, Ani Susilawati, Emilda Adriani, Abdul Malik

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsCargill (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLycopeneSemenSemen qualityAndrologyStatisticsBiologyMathematicsFood scienceMedicineCarotenoid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important factor to successful of artificial insemination (AI) in buffalo was the quality of spermatozoa post-thawed. Therefore, research was conducted on the use of lycopene as an effort to improve the quality of spermatozoa post-thawing. This study aimed to assess the impact of incorporating lycopene into both the skim milk and egg yolk extender at varying doses on pre-freeze and post-thawed Kalang buffalo semen. Four Kalang buffalo, aged between 6 to 7 years and weighing 500-550 kg, were involved in this investigation. Semen collection was conducted weekly a 12-week period using an artificial vagina. Lycopene was added to the skim milk-egg yolk diluent at concentrations of 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%, while the control group received no lycopene substitution. The freshly collected semen underwent macroscopic and microscopic evaluations. Subsequently, the semen was assessed pre-freezing and post-thaw with parameters such as viability, motility, abnormality, and plasma membrane integrity. The findings revealed that the inclusion of 1% and 2% lycopene in the diluent before freezing exhibited significantly higher (P < 0.05) spermatozoa motility. Moreover, the viability and motility of post-thawed semen significantly improved (P < 0.05) at lycopene doses of 1% and 2%. The addition of 1% to 2% lycopene in the extender demonstrated a positive effect on the sperm qualities, particularly enhancing the viability and motility of post-thaw semen from Kalang buffalo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Animal and Veterinary SciencesSame topicFood and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207