Quantifying interactions in the water-energy-food nexus: data-driven analysis utilizing a causal inference method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: There is a pressing need for a holistic approach to optimize water-energy-food (WEF) resources management and to address their interlinkages with other resources due to population growth, socio-economic development, and climate change. However, the structural and spatial extent of the WEF system boundaries cause exponential growth in computational complexity, making exploratory data analysis crucial to obtain insight into the system’s characteristics and focus on critical components. Methods: This study conducts a multiscale investigation of the WEF nexus within the Canadian prairie provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba), utilizing causal-correlational analysis and the multispatial Convergence Cross Mapping (mCCM) method. Initially, we employed regression analysis to establish equations, along with their coefficients of determination (R2), to identify patterns among pairs of WEF sectors, gross domestic product (GDP), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Subsequently, we conducted a causal analysis between correlated pairs using the mCCM method to explore the cause-and-effect relationships between sector pairs within the Canadian prairie provinces; both individually and as a single unit over the period 1990-2020. Results and discussion: Results show that energy and water are the most influential sectors on GHG emissions and GDP in the prairies as a whole. Energy has a stronger influence on GHG compared to water and food sectors, while water has the strongest causal influence on the GDP of Alberta, and food and energy do so for Saskatchewan and Manitoba, respectively. The trade-offs for improving WEF nexus security strongly depend on the scale of the system under investigation, highlighting the need for careful deliberations around boundary judgment for decision-making. This study provides a better understanding of the WEF-GDP-GHG nexus in the Canadian prairies and existing interrelationships among the aforementioned sectors, helping to build more efficient WEF nexus models for further simulation and scenario analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.055 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".