Advancing very short-term rainfall prediction with blended U-Net and partial differential approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and timely prediction of short-term rainfall is crucial for reducing the damages caused by heavy rainfall events. Therefore, various precipitation nowcasting models have been proposed. However, the performance of these models still remains limited. In particular, the current operational precipitation nowcasting method, which is based on radar echo tracking, such as the McGill Algorithm for Precipitation Nowcasting by Lagrangian Extrapolation (MAPLE), has a critical drawback when predicting newly developed or decayed precipitation fields. Recently proposed deep learning models, such as the U-Net convolutional neural network outperform the models based on radar echo tracking. However, these models are unsuitable for operational precipitation nowcasting due to their blurry predictions over longer lead times. To address these blurry effects and enhance the performance of U-Net-based rainfall prediction, we propose a blended model that combines a partial differential equation (PDE) model based on fluid dynamics with the U-Net model. The evaluation of the forecast skill, based on both qualitative and quantitative methods for 0–3-h lead times, demonstrates that the blended model provides less blurry and more accurate rainfall predictions compared with the U-Net and partial differential equation models. This indicates the potential to enhance the field of very short-term rainfall prediction. Additionally, we also evaluated the monthly-averaged forecast skills for different seasons, and confirmed the operational feasibility of the blended model, which contributes to the performance enhancement of operational nowcasting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".