MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390746499 · doi:10.1201/9781003317395-31

Radiocarbon analysis of RNA, DIC, DOC and CH4 to constrain the sustainability of pumping Pleistocene aquifers in Bangladesh

2024· book-chapter· en· W4390746499 on OpenAlexaff
Brian J. Mailloux, M. Rajib H. Mozumder, Benjamín C. Bostick, Tyler Ellis, Charles F. Harvey, G. F. Slater, Elizabeth Trembath‐Reichert, Imtiaz Ahmed Choudhury, Kazi Matin Ahmed, Alexander van Geen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater and Watershed Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersUniversity of DhakaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRadiocarbon datingPleistoceneAquiferSustainabilityGeologyGroundwaterGeographyPaleontologyEcologyBiologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pleistocene aquifers are key for lowering the chronic exposure of the rural population to arsenic. Too little is known, however, about the sources of reactive carbon that maintain reducing conditions in these low-arsenic aquifers. This matters as enhanced supply of reactive carbon due to perturbations in groundwater flow could potentially release arsenic to groundwater. To shed light on this process, our team measures the radiocarbon content of labile microbial matter (RNA) and compares it to the radiocarbon content of potential sources of reactive carbon. Results to date suggest that recent recharge supplies reactive carbon in the dissolved form rather than the sediment, possibly in part in the form of methane. This dynamic situation suggests arsenic concentration could vary of time and should be monitored in vulnerable areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGroundwater and Watershed AnalysisFrench-language works237,207