MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390752937 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3351873

BisDeNet: A New Lightweight Deep Learning-Based Framework for Efficient Landslide Detection

2024· article· en· W4390752937 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChengdu UniversityState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing ScienceState Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment ProtectionChengdu University of TechnologyNational Geographic SocietyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsLandslideComputer scienceDeep learningArtificial intelligenceRendering (computer graphics)Machine learningFeature extractionImage stitchingData miningGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Landslides are catastrophic geological events that can cause significant damage to properties and result in the loss of human lives. Deep learning technology applied to optical remote sensing images can enable effective landslide-prone area detection. However, conventional landslide detection (LD) models often employ complex structural designs to ensure detection accuracy. The complexity often hampers the detection speed, rendering these models inadequate for the swift emergency monitoring of landslides. To address these problems, we propose a new lightweight deep learning-based framework, BisDeNet, for efficient LD. To improve the efficiency of the proposed BisDeNet, we replaced the context path in the original BiSeNet with DenseNet due to its strong feature extraction ability, few required parameters, and low model complexity. Two sites with different and representative landslide developments were selected as the study areas to verify the performance of our proposed BisDeNet. Additionally, we introduced landslide causative factors to enhance the sampling dataset. To evaluate the effectiveness of our approach, we compared the performance of our BisDeNet with the performances of three other BiSeNet-based methods and an advanced Transformer-based model DeiT (Data-efficient Image Transformer). Our experimental results indicate that the F1 scores of BisDeNet in the two study areas are 0.9006 and 0.8850, which are 26.22% and 1.86% higher than the scores of BiSeNet, respectively, but slightly lower than that of the DeiT model. Furthermore, our proposed BisDeNet requires the fewest number of parameters and the least memory out of the five models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it