MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390758143 · doi:10.2138/gselements.19.6.396

Mineralogical Association of Canada

2023· article· en· W4390758143 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueElements · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)GeologyArchaeologyGeochemistryGeographyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HighlightsOur September issue includes a new feature for CJMP, short communications, this time a practical contribution on "Picture-Perfect Petrography: Affordable Thin-Section Scanning for Geoscientists in the Digital Era" from Derek Leung and Andy McDonald.Additional short comms.are in the pipeline.Our research content commences with a cautionary tale on the use of pyrite composition as a prospecting tool for gold mineralization with an example from northern Canada.This encouragingly international issue also features characterization studies of pegmatite-hosted carlosbarbosaite, a critical metal-bearing (U and Nb) pegmatite mineral from Argentina, and stibiotantalite (Sb and Ta) from China.A pentavalent U-bearing mineral, shinkolobweite, has been described from the Democratic Republic of Congo, and a new platinum alloy mineral, sidorovite (PtFe 3 ), reported from Russian placer deposits.In addition, Louis Cabri and Andy McDonald strike borishanskiite and platarsite, two platinum group metal alloys, off the list of accredited mineral species; the former reverts to polarite (PdPb), and the latter to S-rich sperrylite.So edit your databases, manuscripts, and holiday greeting cards accordingly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4270.244

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElementsSame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207