MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390762619 · doi:10.1353/crc.2022.a917038

On Belonging and Not Belonging: Migration, Translation, Dislocation by Mary Jacobus (review)

2022· article· en· W4390762619 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPoeticsAestheticsLiteraturePhilosophyPoetryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: On Belonging and Not Belonging: Migration, Translation, Dislocation by Mary Jacobus Sonia Weiner Mary Jacobus. On Belonging and Not Belonging: Migration, Translation, Dislocation. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2022. Pp. 248. $29.95 hardcover, $29.95 ebook. In On Belonging and Not Belonging: Migration, Translation, Dislocation, Mary Jacobus embarks upon an intellectual journey informed by her early encounters with the migrations and displacements of World War II. Drawing on a diverse selection of texts, Jacobus forms a prism through which she examines the referential world and its contemporary migration crisis. Her book reads as an essayistic meditation on questions seminal to our present moment and considers how notions of belonging and not belonging are negotiated and transformed by migration, translation, and dislocation within and across geographic, historic, and literary spaces. Jacobus does not aim to "resolve" the tensions inherent in this dialogue; rather, she plays with and around them, in an ongoing game of hide-and-go-seek, underlining the "contradictory impulse" at the heart of her inquiry into migratory writers and artists: that of "simultaneously wanting and not wanting to belong" (1), while never able to embody either position fully. Walter Benjamin's theory of translation is central to Jacobus's enterprise; it is through his idea of a work's "translatability" as lying "in its potential to engender new meanings in other linguistic and cultural contexts" (7), that we can understand her technique of connecting between diverse literary genres such as prose, poetry, and plays, and multiple media such as words, photography, visual arts, and films, from different historical periods and varying geographical locations. Jacobus highlights [End Page 474] ways in which authors and artists attempt to "liberate the language imprisoned in a work" through focusing on themes of not/belonging, migration, and displacement, to reiterate that which cannot be communicated at all, namely the text's untranslatability, which echoes the metaphysical and existential condition of the migrant, itinerant, exile, refugee, and other. This shared impulse warrants discussing the texts in conjunction, although some readers might be uncomfortable with the lack of a more historical, literary, or aesthetic approach. As such, the book emerges as Jacobus's own act of recreation and remediation. The chapters (with the exception of the fifth) orchestrate three authors/poets/filmmakers, alongside critical thinkers such as Said, Adorno, Derrida, Heidegger, Kant, Hegel, Levinas and Agamben, who provide background 'music.' The first chapter, "Identity Poetics," explores the possibilities translation offers the writerly subjectivity, opening it to the unfamiliar, the frustrating, or the enabling. The evocative term, identity poetics, introduced as "identity constructed and discovered in another language, rather than inherited or given" (11), is a process that is flexible and ongoing, and hence "potentially transformative" (12). The chapter juxtaposes the freedom Jhumpa Lahiri experiences writing her book In Other Words in Rome in her acquired Italian with Ovid's alienation expressed in Tristia, written during his exile from Rome on the Black Sea. For Lahiri, linguistic exile is a "homecoming" that affirms the "distance and desire, silence and longing" that are at the core of her postcolonial identity (20). Alternately, banished to the "beyond" (24), Ovid resists adaptation, even as he laments the deterioration of his Latin along with his writerly identity. Jacobus observes that Tristia "paradoxically affirms the triumph of the literacy whose loss it laments" (27). The third text, David Malouf's An Imaginary Life, reconceives Ovid's exile as a linguistic encounter with the other who is already within as well as beyond him. If the discussion of Lahiri and Ovid focuses on their poetics of identity, Malouf's writerly identity remains problematically unexamined. Three photographs of the Danube, a river that runs through the discussions of Ovid, Malouf, and Heidegger (in the coda), by Inge Morath, are reproduced within the chapter with no clear analytic function. The title of the second chapter, "Of Birds and Men," a play on John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men and its dustbowl migrants, intertwines forced migration with bird migration in the region of the Mediterranean to "admit the poetry of transhistorical time into the urgency of contemporary migration studies" (37). Taking Virgil's Aeneid, Book VI (the flight from Troy), translated by Seamus...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian review of comparative literatureSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207