MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390766209 · doi:10.1111/ffe.14229

Influence of pore water pressure on concrete creep and a creep model considering the effect of cohesion and internal friction angle

2024· article· en· W4390766209 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Properties and Behavior
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCreepCohesion (chemistry)Materials scienceFriction angleViscoplasticityInternal pressureGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialMechanicsStructural engineeringConstitutive equationGeologyFinite element methodEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new nonlinear viscoplastic body considering cohesion and internal friction coefficient versus time is proposed by considering cohesion and internal friction angle. A new creep model for concrete considering cohesion and internal friction angle is obtained by interlocking it with the conventional model. The results show that the creep model can properly reflect the creep development of soft‐cut concrete at the pile head by comparing the creep model with the three‐dimensional creep test data trends under various levels of loading. The model can well describe the whole process of creep deformation and also better compensate for the shortcomings of the traditional creep model that cannot describe the characteristics of accelerated creep deformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it