Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the early 1900s, a unique wolf-like canid1 first appeared in the forested and agricultural landscapes of north-eastern North America. Later it appeared more frequently in large cities of the region, such as Toronto, Boston and New York City. Considerable debate ensued over the ancestry and taxonomy of the new north-eastern canid. Early observers recognised that this newcomer was too small to be a grey wolf ( Canis lupus ) or an eastern timber wolf ( Canis lycaon ), but too large to be a coyote ( Canis latrans ). Scientists, wildlife managers and the lay public were quick to label these mid-sized animals as coyote-dog hybrids or ‘coydogs’ (Carson 1962; RC 1952; Aldous 1939). However, later evidence suggested that the enigmatic canids were predominantly coyote with some unknown amount of wolf and dog ancestry (Lawrence and Bossert 1969; Kolenosky 1971; Bekoff 1977). Despite the widespread occurrence of hybrids with varying degrees of coyote and wolf ancestry in the eastern half of North America, the term coywolf has only been applied to wild canids with a genetic composition that is predominantly coyote and which inhabit the north-eastern quadrant of the continent. In both the scientific and popular literature, the new north-eastern canids have gone by many names: coyote , eastern coyote , north-eastern coyote , New England Canis , tweed wolf , coydog and coywolf . The latter term coywolf is more recent. Although coywolf has been popularised by the news media and is primarily used by the wildlife biologist who coined the term (Way 2009a), the name lacks support and has not been adopted by other wildlife biologists. Therefore, hereafter I use the term north-eastern (NE) coyote referring to the admixed wild canid with predominantly coyote ancestry that has recently expanded into north-eastern North America. In this chapter, I (1) outline the earliest and most recent genetic discoveries regarding the complex ancestry of NE coyotes, (2) highlight key morphological and dietary distinctions of NE coyotes as compared to coyotes in other geographic regions, and (3) discuss how the presence of NE coyotes in various cities informs the conservation conversation regarding coexistence between humans and wolf-like predators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it