MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390780138 · doi:10.1017/9781800108875.006

Idomeneo’s Operatic Canvas

2023· other· en· W4390780138 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMOZARTOperaArtMusicalTragedy (event)ParadeEPICLiteratureArt historyVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rich visual history surrounding Télémaque makes it impossible not to consider the musical topography of Varesco and Mozart's opera as part of this painterly culture. The opera is an adaptation of one of Fénelon's most striking tableaux: King Idomeneus, in the wreckage of his ship, begging Neptune to spare his life in exchange for a human sacrifice. The aggressively visual lexicon of Fénelon's novel practically cries out for theatrical treatment, and the opera responds to this visual cue with an unusual dramaturgical layout. Idomeneo 's violent seascape breaks away from Mitridate 's suffocatingly enclosed palace walls, and Varesco and Mozart's piece moves ever further away from tragedy's neoclassical architecture into a more epic landscape. As we have discovered, the “canvas” with which Mozart and Varesco began was far from blank and by no means just textual: along with Fénelon's original novel, Crébillon's play, and Danchet's tragédie lyrique, the countless paintings and engravings of Télémacomania added layer upon layer of gesso on top of which Mozart and Varesco started to create their own version of the Idomeneus story. Idomeneo is thus inspired by a multimedia, multilayered cultural backdrop. Contextualizing the opera amid this cache of images and stage adaptations is only a first step in understanding the impact of Fénelon's novel on the work, however. To be sure, Idomeneo is an integral part of the visual tradition inspired by Télémacomania, but more than this, the opera itself is a piece of moving visual art. Its stage space is in fact ideally suited to host the narrative energy of Fénelon's book and, consequently, of reimagining dramaturgy along more epic and visual lines. On the one hand, the opera's dramaturgy in many ways echoes the techniques of Télémacomania's artists. On the other hand, Mozart and Varesco's work surpasses the two-dimensional confines of the texts and paintings that preceded it. The goal of establishing points of compatibility between opera and the visual arts is of course not to equate the two media or suggest that they approach the Idomeneus material in the same way. Rather, the comparison will throw into relief the ways in which opera's relationship to its source texts is heavily mediated by multiple media (image, music, performance).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Literary Studies→French-language works237,207→