MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390780490 · doi:10.1055/a-2223-0405

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for severe fibrosis using a combined water pressure and circumferential-inversion method

2024· article· en· W4390780490 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroshi Takayama, Toshitatsu Takao, Douglas Motomura, Hitomi Hori, Yoshinori Morita, Takashi Toyonaga, Yuzo Kodama

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndoscopic submucosal dissectionFibrosisWater pressureLesionColonoscopyEndoscopyTraction (geology)SurgeryRadiologyPathologyInternal medicineColorectal cancerGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Use of the water pressure method during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been reported to shorten procedure times for colorectal lesions with fibrosis [ 1 ] [ 2 ]; however, ESD for cases with severe fibrosis remains extremely challenging [ 3 ]. We recently reported a novel traction method called the circumferential-inversion method (CIM), which involves inverting the lesion circumferentially [ 4 ]. In this report, we describe the effectiveness of ESD using a novel approach that combines the water pressure method and CIM (WP-CIM) for lesions with severe fibrosis ([ Video 1 ]). Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download Endoscopic submucosal dissection is performed using a novel approach that combines the water pressure method and the circumferential-inversion method for a lesion on a scar with severe fibrosis.Video 1 The case involved a 69-year-old woman with a 30-mm 0-IIa tumor on the scar created by a previous endoscopic submucosal resection in the sigmoid colon ([ Fig. 1 ] a ). Local injection at the scar site did not result in any elevation ([ Fig. 1 ] b ). We attempted ESD using the water pressure method; however, it was challenging to approach the submucosal layer at the scar site ([ Fig. 1 ] c,d ). After performing a complete circumferential incision and trimming, we grasped the specimen by applying an orthodontic rubber band (inner diameter, 8 mm) and clips (SureClip 8 mm; Micro-Tech, Nanjing, China) from five directions ([ Fig. 2 ] a ). The combination of the water pressure method and CIM enabled us to access the submucosal layer effectively ([ Fig. 2 ] b ). Further dissection from the left and right sides allowed us to recognize the dissection line at the scar site ([ Fig. 2 ] c ). The dissection was completed without any complications, resulting in an R0 resection ([ Fig. 2 ] d ). Fig. 1 Endoscopic views during endoscopic submucosal dissection using the water pressure method showing: a a 30mm 0-IIa tumor on the scar created by endoscopic submucosal resection in the sigmoid colon; b lack of elevation following local injection at the scar site; c severe fibrosis at the scar site that made it challenging to approach the submucosal layer; d the water pressure method being used, but it remained challenging to approach the submucosal layer. Fig. 2 Endoscopic views during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using a novel approach that combines the water pressure method and the circumferential-inversion method (CIM; WP-CIM) showing: a the specimen grasped from five directions with an orthodontic rubber band and clips after complete circumferential incision and trimming had been performed; b WP-CIM being used, which allowed effective access to the submucosal layer; c further dissection from the left and right sides allowing recognition of the dissection line at the scar site; d R0 resection completed without complications using CIM-enhanced buoyancy and the water pressure effect. Because CIM is inversion traction, it enhances the effectiveness of the water pressure method in an airless environment. Additionally, CIM improves the visibility of the dissection line at the scar site by promoting dissection not only from the front but also from the left and right sides. We propose that WP-CIM facilitates ESD for lesions with severe fibrosis. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy , reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/ ). This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos . Publication History Article published online: 09 January 2024 © 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207