MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390781440 · doi:10.36040/jati.v7i4.7024

PERANCANGAN USER INTERFACE DAN USER EXPERIENCE APLIKASI PENJUALAN FURNITURE INTERIOR & BUILD PADA TOKO STEPLINE MENGGUNAKAN METODE GOAL DIRECTED DESIGN (GDD)

2024· article· id· W4390781440 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Data Mining
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

User Interface (UI) berperan penting dalam memberikan kesan awal yang baik kepada pengguna mulai dari desain visual hingga tata letak tools pada aplikasi mobile. Sedangkan User Experience (UX) membantu membangun interaksi antara pengguna dengan aplikasi mobile, seperti pengalaman yang dialami pengguna dalam menggunakan aplikasi hingga pengalaman untuk menemukan dan memahami informasi yang tersedia. Toko Stepline membutuhkan sebuah perancangan UI/UX dengan tujuan untuk memudahkan pemilik maupun pelanggan dalam proses transaksi yang lebih mudah kedepannya dan untuk memastikan bahwa aplikasi yang akan dibangun sesuai dengan kebutuhan pengguna. Dengan menggunakan metode Goal Directed Design (GDD) peneliti dapat mengetahui kebutuhan apa saja yang diperlukan pengguna. Hasil perancangan ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode System Usability Scale (SUS). Metode ini berfokus pada kebutuhan dan tujuan pengguna. dengan melakukan pengujian menggunakan System Usability Scale (SUS) sebagai pengujian hasil penelitian mendapatkan hasil skor 70,5 dengan grade C dikategorikan Acceptable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0070.014
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it