MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390782308 · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c02104

NIR-Emitting Gold Nanoclusters Encapsulated in PS-<i>b</i>-PEG Polymer Micelles

2024· article· en· W4390782308 on OpenAlexafffund
Bárbara Casteleiro, Talita de Francesco, J. M. G. Martinho, Arnaud Favier, Marie‐Thérèse Charreyre, Matthew G. Moffitt, José Paulo S. Farinha

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut de Chimie de Lyon
KeywordsNanoclustersBiocompatibilityPolystyreneCopolymerMicelleEthylene glycolPolymerLuminescenceMaterials scienceAqueous solutionNanocompositeChemical engineeringNanotechnologyColloidal goldPolymer chemistryNanoparticleChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) are an emerging type of luminescent probe, featuring good biocompatibility, high photostability, and large Stoke shifts. Their lack of colloidal stability is, however, a drawback for many applications. Here, we report the stabilization of AuNCs emitting in the NIR by a thiol-terminated polystyrene chain ( M n = 5000 g mol –1 ). The optical properties of this nanocomposite remain invariant for 2 years in THF. To use the PS 5k -AuNCs in an aqueous environment, these were encapsulated into polymer micelles using a polystyrene- b -poly(ethylene glycol) copolymer. The resulting hierarchical constructs, with diameters of ca. 125 to 215 nm, have promising properties for applications as luminescent probes such as contrast agents for biomedical imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicNanocluster Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207