MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390783359 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2023.3347744

Intelligent Optimization Algorithm for Green IoV Networks Based on SSA

2024· article· en· W4390783359 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Yin, Yaohui Lyu, Lingwei Xu, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOptimization problemMathematical optimizationBig dataParticle swarm optimizationAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid development of the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) has been enabled by sixth-generation (6G) mobile communication and artificial intelligence technologies. However, with the explosive growth of vehicle big data. However, big data transmission consumes a significant amount of energy. Green IoV networks have received increasing attention. Power consumption optimization plays an important role in green IoV networks. Using decode-and-forward (DF) relaying, we investigate the intelligent power allocation optimization of green cooperative IoV networks. Based on the characteristics of mobile channels, we employ outage probability (OP) criterion to analyze communication performance of green cooperative connected IoV networks from a mathematical perspective. Novel OP mathematical expressions are obtained. Using the obtained OP results, we investigate the problem of OP performance minimization via power allocation optimization. The complex non-convex problem of power allocation is formulated, as well as the optimization function. Based on the sparrow search algorithm (SSA), an intelligent optimization algorithm is proposed to solve the above complex problem. The proposed SSA approach is compared to the state-of-the-art intelligence algorithms, and our proposed algorithm can achieve a shorter running time and a good OP performance, thereby enhancing the system's efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207