MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390787997 · doi:10.5014/ajot.2024.050371

Effectiveness of a Driving and Community Mobility Intervention for Teens and Young Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder

2024· article· en· W4390787997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne E. Dickerson, Lauren Turbeville, Qiang Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutism spectrum disorderIntervention (counseling)AnxietyRepeated measures designAutismPhysical therapyClinical psychologyPsychologyMedicineDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IMPORTANCE: Driving and community mobility (DCM) is key to supporting independence in teens and young adults (TYA) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an intervention focused on DCM can effectively improve DCM knowledge and skills in TYA. DESIGN: A pretest-posttest design using the same intervention and outcome measures. SETTING: University research setting. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight participants with ASD completed the program (M age = 17.76 yr, SD = 3.58). Twenty-six (68%) were male, and 12 (32%) were female. INTERVENTION: A 5-day intensive intervention using group and individualized strategies, including driving simulation, focused on improving performance skills needed for DCM. OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Total and category scores of the Performance Analysis of Driving Ability (P-Drive) were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance measuring time (pretest vs. posttest), gender, and year of intervention. Paired t tests were used to determine the outcomes of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), anxiety measure and perception survey. RESULTS: Results indicated a significant main effect for time (p < .001) and year (p < .036), but not gender (p < .26), with no significant interaction effects, supporting the fidelity of the intervention. The COPM showed significant changes (p ≤ .001) in both performance and satisfaction, as well as a reduction in anxiety (p = .008). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Outcomes suggest that the intervention successfully improved DCM knowledge and skills for TYA. This adds new evidence that an occupational therapy intervention specific to TYA with ASD is effective in developing independence in DCM. Plain-Language Summary: Driving is the primary mode of community mobility in North America and other Western countries. Adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who have a means of community mobility have a chance of employment that is 5 times greater than that for those who do not. Driving and community mobility are key to supporting independence among teens and young adults with ASD. However, teens and young adults with ASD have significantly lower rates of getting a driver's license. The results of this study show that occupational therapy practitioners can play a critical role in addressing driving and community mobility. Occupational therapy interventions that are specifically designed for and unique to each teen and young adult with ASD can effectively improve driving and community mobility skills and increase independence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Occupational TherapySame topicOlder Adults Driving StudiesFrench-language works237,207