MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390788814 · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51643-1

Lower body negative pressure identifies altered central vein characteristics without accompanying changes to baroreflexes in astronauts within hours of landing

2024· article· en· W4390788814 on OpenAlexafffund
Carmelo Mastrandrea, Danielle K. Greaves, J. Kevin Shoemaker, Andrew P. Blaber, Philippe Arbeille, Richard L. Hughson

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpaceflight effects on biology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityWestern UniversityResearch Institute for AgingUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJohnson Space CenterKennedy Space CenterJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEuropean Space AgencyUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsSupine positionMedicineCentral venous pressureOrthostatic intoleranceBlood pressureCardiologyInferior vena cavaInternal medicineLower bodyBlood volumeStroke volumeSpaceflightBaroreflexVenous return curveHeart rateHemodynamicsAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular deconditioning and altered baroreflexes predispose returning astronauts to Orthostatic Intolerance. We assessed 7 astronauts (1 female) before and following long-duration spaceflight (146 ± 43 days) with minimal upright posture prior to testing. We applied lower body negative pressure (LBNP) of up to - 30 mmHg to supine astronauts instrumented for continual synchronous measurements of cardiovascular variables, and intermittent imaging the Portal Vein (PV) and Inferior Vena Cava (IVC). During supine rest without LBNP, postflight elevations to total peripheral resistance (TPR; 15.8 ± 4.6 vs. 20.8 ± 7.1 mmHg min/l, p < 0.05) and reductions in stroke volume (SV; 104.4 ± 16.7 vs. 87.4 ± 11.5 ml, p < 0.05) were unaccompanied by changes to heart rate (HR) or estimated central venous pressure (CVP). Small increases to systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were not statistically significant. Autoregressive moving average modelling (ARMA) during LBNP did not identify differences to either arterial (DBP → TPR and SBP → HR) or cardiopulmonary (CVP → TPR) baroreflexes consistent with intact cardiovascular control. On the other hand, IVC and PV diameter-CVP relationships during LBNP revealed smaller diameter for a given CVP postflight consistent with altered postflight venous wall dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicSpaceflight effects on biologyFrench-language works237,207