The Root-Lesion Nematode, <i>Pratylenchus penetrans</i>, Affects Early Growth and Physiology of Grafted M.9, G.41, and G.935 Apple Rootstocks Similarly Under Field Microplot Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus penetrans, is a ubiquitous parasite of roots of temperate fruit trees. It affects early growth of trees replanted into former orchard sites where populations have built up and may contribute to decline complexes of older trees. Most British Columbia, Canada, apple acreage is planted with M.9 rootstock, but growers are increasingly considering Geneva-series rootstocks such as G.41 and G.935. Among these rootstocks, responses to P. penetrans, specifically, are poorly known. To compare the resistance and tolerance to P. penetrans of G.41, G.935, and M.9 rootstocks (‘Ambrosia’ scion), a field microplot experiment was established in spring of 2020 at the Summerland Research and Development Centre. The experimental design was a two by three factorial combination of: P. penetrans inoculation (+/−) and rootstock (G.41, G.935, and M.9), with 20 replicate microplots of each of the six treatment combinations arranged in a randomized complete block design. The P. penetrans inoculum was 5,400 nematodes per microplot (54 P. penetrans liter −1 soil), which is below commonly accepted damage thresholds. Though P. penetrans population densities were lower for the G.41 rootstock by the end of the 2021 growing season, the effects of P. penetrans were similar among rootstocks. In the establishment year (2020), P. penetrans caused significant reductions in aboveground growth. In 2021, shoot growth and root weight were reduced by P. penetrans. The nematode also reduced rates of leaf gas exchange and stem water potential. These data suggest that while G.41 and G.935 may have other horticultural benefits over M.9, they are equally susceptible to P. penetrans at the early stages of tree growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".